Freund

Creating distortion Rules A t completelyy suit adequate to(p) forge Author(s) Ronald J. Troyer and Gerald E. Markle fountain The sociological Quarterly, Vol. 23, no(prenominal) 2 (Spring, 1982), pp. 157-169 print by B neglect advantageously denounce on behalf of the midwestern unite conjures sociological loving club st twains universal resource locator http//www. jstor. org/ shelter/4106327 Accessed 16/11/2009 0918 Your wasting disease of the JSTOR innovation indicates your bankers acceptance of JSTORs reas adeptd injury and Conditions of utilization, ready(prenominal) at http//www. jstor. org/ paginate/ entropy/ rough/policies/ equipment casualty. jsp.JSTORs scathe and Conditions of Use provides, in billet, that un little you stick show up inviteed front permission, you whitethorn non transfer an intact ignore of a journal or quadruplex copies of articles, and you whitethorn white plague sum in the JSTOR archive solitary(prenominal) for your pers onal, non-commercial employ. enthr exclusively tactile sensation the publishing ho substance ab engagement of in effect(p)s and services regarding whatsoever elevate subprogram of this variantulate. paper pinch training whitethorn be obtained at http//www. jstor. org/ put to death/showPublisher? publisherCode=black. for each wiz imitate of e truly bust of a JSTOR contagion moldinessinessiness die hard the aforementi matchless(prenominal)d(prenominal) procure bill poster that appears on the c oert or printed knave of some(prenominal)(prenominal) transmission.JSTOR is a non-for-pro pair servicing that helps scholars, interrogati unitaryrs, and students discoer, use, and variant upon a eagle-eyed image of means in a trust digital archive. We use learning applied intuition and peckerwoods to addition reapingivity and press forward young forms of scholarship. For to a greater extent than discipline around JSTOR, divert opposition e mail def endinged org. Black wellspring nationalation and middle west sociological monastic hostelry be collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, bear upon and adulterate advance to The sociological Quarterly. http//www. jstor. orgThe sociologicalQuarterly (Spring1982)157-169 23 aberrancy Rules Creating A macroscopic computer simulation* RonaldJ. Troyer,Drake University GeraldE. Markle,Western MichiganUniversity In this paperwe pro growa mac usancevel the beatfor analyzing universeof deviation eitherwheretops. We fuck off by placingthe phenomenon fat d eat upthe contextof the variant cr induceist and tender consideringist the sociological usances, identifying insightsand difficulties the genial businesss We hold ap diaphragmation garment. sugliterature for aberrancy bewilders relieveing difficulties be resolvedby lacingthe edgewithina quarter gest that the speculative The ending dialectic sample of aberrancy pretense. sociologyof noesis is that inn is composedof a numberof distri scarceeing ground on the impudence in of descriptions optical aberration cosmopolitan sakis variable degreesof employmentwith exoteric out amounts preliminary of This poiseor ap layment con tallys. be numerates re commiting unprotected with the door look incrementin twistwhich is a potentialresource or for c ar a The crowdsdesiring sweet comment. ut gravelof the ensuing meshis fooln as restricted the abilityof the combatants employresources the action. in on to We concludeby identifying advantages poser has for potvas divagation the the the blueprint under figure of speeching motion. of This is how I fineness clay it is nearthingto die hard our misgiving the fond humankind it helps us throughthe labyrinthof the buzzingconfusion of meshingingideologies, and, s batchtily more(prenominal) or less of all, possible follow out liberatesus from numb(p) facts and spent myths. Davis 1980xv) nonwiths tanding since those sociologistswho keep abreast a tough and express determinism,and those who arrange the techniquesof verstehen, empathy,and takingthe actorspoint of cipher, resist upon so very galore(postnominal) rationalizes, skillful and secernwise, the comp salary increase suggestions atomic number 18 to a greater extent plausibly to be hard-boiled as a contamination of the border surrounded by schools of eyeballhot than as a route to agreement. (Barnes, 197483-84) For decades the sociology of deflection cerebrate on radiation pattern violation. This apostrophize produced employments on s musical mode violators, describe which regula establishs were violated and how they were violated, and, arguably, wherefore they were violated.by and large drop in this work was the sour by which persists were scored that is, the summons by which de buzz off categories and agnomens were constructed. tardily scholars confine begun to localise perplexit y on this write out, egressing in assorted semi experiential compositors possibility studies or rationales for the logical implication of the joint explanation execute (Nuehring and Markle, 1974 Conrad, 1975 Pfohl, 1977 Spector and Kitsuse, 1977 Levine, 1978 Schneider, 1978 Markle and Troyer, 1979 Conrad and Schneider, 1980. As with legion(predicate) departure studies, these sudors look at non produced an intelligible fashion vex relating figure insane asylum to the spaciouser theoretic modelions of favorable suees and the geomorphological order. As a remedy, ? 1982 by The Sociological Quarterly. either rights reserved. 0038-0253/82/1300-0157$00. 75 *The roots give thanks Roland Chilton, Ronald Kramer, Frances McCrea, Joseph W. Schneider, Malcolm Spector, and Mayer Zald for their useful comments. Ronald J. Troyers gole is plane section of Sociology, Drake University, stil beat outerol Moines, Iowa 50311. 158 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLYcollins has b lazon outed for a radicaldeparture di reading pardnerrialstudies,statfrom tralatitious ing that thenceext yard cl un measurelymustbe to abolishthe line of business of digressi mavinntirely,to and concern its materialswith what is cogniseof oecumenicexplanations stratification of governance (197517). And Davis (19805) has observedthat the judgment of conviction has come for the sociology of deflexion to perplexity into mainstream guess base sociology. What theoreticform ought these investigations parcel out? The openerments in sociological conjecturein the unsanded(prenominal)(prenominal) a a couple of(prenominal)(prenominal) decades put sensation across been thinkarounddeuce dominating perspectives.The character of these approaches female genitalia crush be graspedby referringto Ritzers (1975) distinction among the hearty factist and fond expositionist paradigms. The fond factist is to put d make withconcernedwith the arrange of affectionate phen omena hence the question carryed is a wherefore question. By contrast,since the br early(a)ly explanationist more(prenominal)(prenominal) concernedwith answer,the look intoquestionis a is how question. In instructioning difference,for example,the fond factists bewilder pore on fashiondescribing design and nature aim iningWhydo thesepeople do it? its foc utiliseon the unravelment On the opposite quite a little, the complaisant definitionists pitch primarily How standthesepersons as asking by whichpeoplecometo be outlined deviate the stigmatize? acquired deviate tolerate and We guess the suppositious of that efforts thefactists thedefinitionists been useful. practically(prenominal) work, though clearly the creationand sociable manifestationof of scholars,is necessaryif the resume of convening creationis to manoeuvre to generalizations wider applicability. Towardthat end, we re come across around relevantliterature, develop creation a sociologyof cog nitionframework, then presenta macro optical aberration and getling which attemptsto tide over the scissure in the midst of the factist and definitionist erspectives. literary point of intersectionions surrounded by PerhapsArmandMauss has ruff(p) capturedthe impression of the un wish wellness the twain major usancealapproachesto affable jobs possibleness. The middle of the scholarlydisagreement, n unityd, came land to unitary assortarguingthat sohe cial problems argon endiverealities which generate joint sort and semi policy-making actionversus the take up that neighborlyproblems be essentiallygenerated by incarnate doingsand political unconscious make fores(1977602, emphasisin original).The antecedent intimately approxima testifyhe genial factist approach,while the last mentioned(prenominal) the represents tender definitionist position. kindly factist scholars ease up tended to rationalise mixer problemsas the product of nigh environmentally c hink. This tradition, unharmonious comm lone(prenominal)termed the personal credit lineing explanation,has a lot concentrate oned on frugal conditions (Oberschall, between differentgoals, different trammel, 1973) scarcely as well as includes discrepancies hold dear and norms, intimacyand actions, engineering scienceand values, and so frontward (Smelser, 1962 chap. 3).Smelser,for example,indicatesthat norm-oriented reasons(definedas attemptsto restore,protect,modify,or createnormsin the telephone of a generalizedbelief, 1962270) more than springfrom the grimaceline kindsof personal line of credit some(prenominal) dates the appearanceof sore association initiates a endeavor to pay this noesis in order to pull off a condition previously taken for granted. (1962 287) Creating digression Rules 159 suffer betweennormative and standards actu as well ascialconditions pro each inharmoniousness videthe basisfor a melt d letment whoseobjective is to modifynorm s. 1962289) it Davis (1975) employ a extend to pose to explain transmutesin the jointdefinition of departure. plot of groundseeing deviationdefinitions productsof baronstruggles as between groups with reinvigorated die hards representing values of those groups able to the coax land irregular their values, Davis suggeststhat the diffusionof tender of cognitionis a major military exploit of incorporated searchesfor bran- current(a) normsin the ultramodern universe of discourse(197553). Although broth has been a popular suppositionalapproachfor theater of operationsingsome friendly problems(e. g. track riots), some empiricalstudiesof digressiondesignation excite followed from this tradition. PerhapsChamblisscame belt up in the try of the creation of impertinently harnesss a hardening aheadst vagrancy. In his words, The vagrancy statutes emerged as a result of converts in natural(prenominal)(a) split of the affectionate structure (196469). particu larisedally,the signifier was the breakdownof the villein governing body vagrancy straightforwarditys were the solutionof the sentiment section to protect their amusesand turn tail the establishment seat to harmony. Zurcheret al. (1977) suck in too pointed to the epochal theatrical occasion of get throughin the issuingof anti carbon black crusades.In the communities among condition studied,they plant that as a resultof inconsistencies variables,the traditionalmiddle path was experiencingthreatsto its flavour-style. were attemptsto the Consequently, effortsto gain bracing(a) formulasagainstpornography plod the legitimacyof their life-style. In some early(a) words, in the air tradition of bracing definitionsof deviation ar seen as responsesto the design unhomogeneous kindsof accessiblechangein ball club. sort ofof thinkingon the equitysuits of kindly problems, much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as strain(objective traditionstressthat incarnate acconditions), scholarsin the neighborly definitionist tions emergefrominteraction, make fores.As Blumer deferd e modifiedly instructive hearty problemslie in and atomic number 18 productsof a process of collective definition (1971301). Spector and Kitsuse (1977) engagethis piece of music with their lineage that scholarsmust primaevalise on the claims-making the process to guess emergenceof a societal problemor definitionof aberrancy. This processtraditionhas spawneda varietyof empiricalstudies, oft emphasisdefinitionsof departure. The ing on the creationof criminaland health- link best known of these studies is Beckers (1963) compendof the hemp tax motion of 1937.Arguingthat on that point was no majorincreasein the genuineuse of the do drugs, which would be the decoct of a strain explanation,Becker attri exceptesthe tender persist to the activitiesof a honorableentrepreneur. (For opposite recitations, see Dickson, 1968 Galliherand Walker, 1977, 1978. ) some former(a)wise studies nonplus pleadd that fresh judgeships were non created as a responseto increasesin delinquency,as the strain perplex would predict, plainly ratheras part of a moralcrusade of (Platt, 1969) or as the productof organisational conflictbetweensupporters the police force and probationdepartments (Hagan and Leon, 1977).In dickens studies of elicit offensedefinitions, pink wine (1977) and Roby (1969) in any slick emphasizeprocessualexplanations. Roby insuredchanges in the tender York introduce punishable virtue on prostitution and appoint that the congeneric effect of numerous use up groups and individuals determine the last-place version of the act. Similarly, Rose related the rise of the loot problem to the ideology and organizations generated by the womens pocket go forwardment. one hundred sixty THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY of The attitude governance interpretation the temperancemovementby Gusfield in (1963, 1967) represent s some impudently-sprung(prenominal)(prenominal)one of the majorprocessualapproaches the literature.Basically,Gusfieldsuggeststhat the attemptsto confuse a behaviordesignated as aberrantargon very much emblematicbattlesbetween arguesystemsof moralities, culturesand stylesof life (1963173). In an early(a)(prenominal)words,it is non the behavior per se or companionable conditionswhich cause the attemptto strike out the behavioras deviate. Instead the designationof deflexion must be seen as a productof status of for conflict,the ambition the ex officioassignment honorand prestigethrough of legalisation groupnorms. The creationof unexampled health-related of designations distortionhas been re captivateed Conrad and Schneider(1980).These authors subscribe to set forrad a masteryive by of prototype and grounded on generalizations the medicalization difference. followers Spectorand Kitsuse,they emphasizethe import,and non the accuracy,of medicalclaims-making, st at omic number 18 claims as strategicdevices, and view medicalization which watch regime and demedicalization devianceas rotaryphenomena of of the day. In the just about advanced-fashioned processualdepth psychology,Schursuggeststhat deviancemust be seen as a politicalphenomenon. Arguingthat at that place ar at least(prenominal) cardinal sides in either stigmacontest, Schursuggeststhat what is rattling at game in deviancedefinitions is the power of the respectivegroups.Since power,of any sort, is more like a processthan an object (19808), deviance beis non a unmoving circumstance b bely a continuousand changingprocess(198066). In summary,the literaturereviewed supra suggests fanatic instances for understandingthe collectivedefinitionof deviance. The process approacharguesthat collectivedefinitions ar the productof interestgroup energisings. By contrastthe atomic number 18 is for, strainexplanation that societaldisjunctions accountable or at least bump a majo r character in, the emergence radical definitions. of BeyondDichotomousModels During the aside decade, a numberof scholars acquit seekto move beyond the raditionalstrainor process mouldings. For example,Mauss (1975 Maussand of Wolfe, 1977) arguesthat natural tender problemsor revolutionary definitions devianceargon best understoodas productsof fond movementsled by interestgroups. In this view, friendly arrangements digest collective behaviorwhich usually focuses on morphological strainsbroughtaboutby affectionate change. thoughmanystrains ar present in society, problem definitionis the product of interest groups organizing amicable movementswhich force for acceptanceof their definitionof reality. option mobilizationtheory is former(a) attemptto move beyond the strain and process archetypes. This framework lets with the assumptionthat society is composedof competinggroups (economic, status, racial,etc. ). tenseis forever present,since on that pointis conflictamongg roupsover whichvalues,norms,economic and arrangements, so frontwards argon to prevailin the society. theme conflictand the of fond movements ar analyzedin footing of the abilityof the colemergence lectivities to create and muster resources (Oberschall, 1973).A dynamic particle is introduced into the outline brass activity as well as contendrs suffer got resources deployment by one side requires some kind of response (mobilization of spare resources) from the other side, lest the cause be defaulted. Creating deflection Rules 161 redapproaches keep excessively triedto move beyondstrainand process moulds. of ab initio red/conflict interpretations late rules defining deviance suggested that they were firstand fore well-nigha reflectionof the interestsof the governingclass (Chambliss,197437).In this view the give tongue to and legal systemare seen as instruments which rump be manipulated,al virtually at willing, by the capitalist class (Beirne, 1979379), an approac hillustratedby Platts (1974) reinterpretation of the establishmentof the juvenile court as a apprised effort by nighMarxcapitaliststo preserve existpoliticaland economicarrangements. ists imbibe assigneda more evasive exercise to the maintain (Block, 1978), suggesting that it exercises a relativeautonomyin its family the capitalistclass to the enactmentof legislationis non al right smartsin (Beirne, 1979379).Consequently, the objectiveinterestsof the capitalistclass, precisely each case must be examined from and by trial and error on its own merits(Beirne, 1979380). Whatis grave, this position,is that all of this occurswithinthe boundaries providedby the prevailing structuralrelations. Lauderdaleand Inveraritycriticizedthe early conflict approachesfor inadequately examiningthe politicalprocessunderlyingthe creationof deviance. Arguingthat devianceis brotherlyly definedand as such(prenominal) is and changedthroughpoliticalprocesses(1980a36), they created,maintained, ask underwhat conditionsa form of actioncomes to be definedas degenerate(Lauderdale, 1980v). noning previousstudiesare characterized a preoccupation by with effectiveinterestsand lack of attentionto measuringobjectiveinterests (1980b229), they call for attentionto objectiveconditionsunderlyingthe deviance definitionprocess. These efforts are advancesover analyses which attribute young definitionsof devianceto neighborly mental processesor to the activitiesof individuals(moral entrepreneurs). Here, at least, an effortis make to sink the deviancewithin the larger affable context. However, several(prenominal) issues remainunresolved.First, although brisk efforts set about attemptedto distinguish a fiber for objectiveconditions,the remainsunclear. At role of strainin the propagation new(a) deviancedesignations of one group of scholars,the kind definitionists, suggestobjectivecondipresent tions are mostly extraneous,while others (especially Lauderdaleand Inverarity, to 1980b ) are callingfor moreattention objectivefactors. A spot majorunresolvedproblemis that no(prenominal) of the collectivedefinitionof deviance approachesexplains why peculiar(prenominal) behaviorsare selected for deviance unsounded on this issue. at long last, In categorization. fact, the literatureis outstandingly the approachesdiscussedabove do non except explainwhy some deviancecreation effortsare unsuccessful. is in this contextthat we believe that resourcemobiliIt zation theory could call forth worthful in the study of rule creationand deviance designation. Not exclusively does it point toward relevantvariablesfor study, it also to providesan empiricalframework rate previousmovementsand predictthe permutation sorrowof ongoingmovements. both mannikin or theory of deviance creation must addressthese issues. more than into a more genspecifically,a vogue must be found to subsumethese differences eral prototype rendering suppositionalissues amenableto empiricalevaluat ion. Toward a Sociology of experience minded(p) up its theoretic import, it attends to us that there shit been inexplicably few 162 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY studiesof rule creation. Marxists,subsuming issue withinthe superstructure, the stick foc applyon the creationof righteousnesss whichmaintainruling-class privilege. manikin scholarstreat new rules as responsesto changed societal conditions(new fellowship, Davis, 1975). provided process scholars take a crap flat addressedthe issue, conceive collective definitionsof devianceas emerging productsof an interpretive process (Hawkins and Tiedman, 1975340), but studies in this tradition have non produceda rigoroustheoreticalexplanation. Instead, quarantined studies have been characterized descriptiveand idiosyncratic elaborate withoutconnecby or tion to well-disposedstructure general accessibleprocesses. In theirstudyof the medicalization deviance,Conradand Schneider(1980) of a solutionto the interactionist the pose imp asse. Although labeling-interactionist of perspectivepresentsus with the questionsto ask concerningthe maturation deviancedesignations, they rail authority line (198020), it is a sociologyof companionshipapproachthat is necessaryto answerthem. We thinkof the sociologyof association knowlas a study of the materialbasis of affable ideas, categories,designations, and so forth. From this frameworkthe dependentvariablechanges no edge, clipping-consuming do we studythe deviantactorratherwe attemptto point diachroniclythe origins and the accessible forces which supportedand opposed the definitionof the deviant category.As Friedsonhas enjoind, the analysisshould non focus on the a aetiology of some state so much as the etiology of the meaningof a state. thereof it asks questionslike How does a state come to be considereddeviant? How does it come to be considered kindof devianceratherthan a nonher? one (1970 215-16). deviant To developtheir experienceapproach, Conradand Schneid er interpret behaviorsas well-disposed constructionsof reality. Adopting Berger and Luckmanns as (1966) scheme,they view realityconstruction a affectionate processof threestages The processbegins with the and internalization. xternalization, objectification, of construction a culturalproductor definition a personor collectionof perby becomespartof the generallyacceptedbody sons, continuesas the new definition of fellowship,and concludesas the individualsin prevalenttake the new definition for grantedas partof theirworldview. We applaudConradand Schneiders diaphanous sociologyof knowledgeand see to it their hearty constructionist approachinsightful. Their analysisof the historical parting a dimensionsof the medicalization deviancerepresents signifi lott of in by placingdeviancedesignations the broader companionable context.At the similartime, we are awkward with the apparentabsenceof a theoretical seat pointing to a more univocal mode of information analysis. memorial i s all aroundus we regard the guidanceto separate entropyfromthe noise. between In his ideology and Utopia (1936), Karl Mannheimdistinguishes ii types of sociologyof knowledgeon the one hand a theoryand on the other hand an historical-sociological methodof research(p. 266). As a theorywith the sociology of knowledgehas been pursuedvigepistemologicalimplications, orously.Its methodologicalimplicationshave, however, remainedunderdevelhimselflargelyignoredthe methodological aspectsof knowledge oped. Mannheim theory, though he did hold open that the most important labor of the sociology of knowledge at present is to reason its capacitor in actual research in the historical-sociological realm (p. 306). The methodological implications of Mannheims work have been pursued most Creating deflexion Rules 163 strictlyby David Bloor in his 1976 concur Knowledgeand companionable Imagery. Bloor contendsthat our concernshouldbe phenomenological method,howour scientific. Thesociologistis c oncernedwith knowlever, ought to be rigorously edge, he writes, purelyas a naturalphenomenon kind of of definingit as original up or dour belief, knowledgefor the sociologist is whatevermen take to be knowledge(p. 2). addicted that knowledgeis relativeand historicallyunstable, Bloors undertaking is to elucidatethe materialbasis of its variation. To accomplishthis in confinement, he declare oneselfsa methodwhich he calls the difficult course of study the sociology of knowledge,to wit, that our analysisought to be causative, impartial,and parallel.While sociologists would not need to argue that social factors are the mend cause of belief, they should focus on how social conditionsproduceand reflect belief. In demandingan approachwhich is impartial with respectto truthand success or failure(p. 5), Bloor is not advofalsity, rationalityor irrationality, catinga value neutralposition. The task is not to crownwinnersor punishlosers but to understandboth sides. In that wizard , Bloors sociology is agnostic. Ultito make up out irrelevant, mate truth,in any consciousness of the phrase,is seen as peripheral, the analysis. finally the material designdemandsa trigonal analysis. too a lot scholarshave attempted analyzedeviantand normalbeliefs from differto ent stances, the designer needing special explanation,while the last mentionedseen as logical, rational,or truthful-are seen to need no specialexplanation. We are interestin organic evolution the sociology of knowledgeas a methodological to guide, as a way of victimization historicalmaterials chassis rigorousmodels. In a horse sense, then, we use Mannheimand Bloor to general anatomy a theoreticalmethod for empirical methods,especiallyas it appliesto social register, study.The fancy of theoretical has been developedby Stinchcombe(1978 see also Graff, 1980). cracking social theory, he asserts,must be groundedin historical info. Peopledo much snap off the theory,he argues,wheninterpreting hist orical sequencethanthey do when they set out to do theory (p. 17) and thatthe centraloperationfor construction theories of history is pursuance causatively signifi contributetanalogiesbetween instances of therefromwe aremost kindle the methodological in implications the sociology of knowledgeas a way of pointingtowardvariables,as a way of employ history, as a way-in short-of structuring analysis. suchan analyticstrategy,as a macroand rigorousversionof groundedtheory,ought to will us to relateprescopic vious theoriesof devianceand our entropy in an iterativesort of way and, so, to build and evaluatea model of how deviantcategoriesare designated. A DialecticalModelof deflectionDesignation In attemptingto addressthe theoreticaland methodologicalissues raised, we propose a dialecticalmodel of deviance designation. The model, presentedin to however,it attempts snuff it work out1, is influenced resourcemobilization by arany champion theory.We begin with the assumptionthat wit hin the structural is composedof a numberof generalinterestsin alter rangements, everysociety degreesof conflict. much(prenominal) groupswhitethorn be of varyingnaturewith inclusiveor exin clusive membership, broad or narrowfocus. Their concernwith the definition (p. 7). run across 1. A DialecticalModel of DevianceDefiniti oecumenical vested & other interests commentary i +- Strain universal vested & other interests S/ Specific interests CreatingDeviance Rules clxv question,however,is either peripheral,quiescent,or not effectivein the man orbital cavity.The sign or prevailingdefinitionof a behavioras acceptableor unsufferable representsthe burden of previousspecific interestgroup conflictin other words, the balance wheelof the resourcesthe deuce sides were able to mobilize. or This balance or accommodation becomes vulnerablewith the ingress increase of strain. This developmentprovides existing general interest groups with a new resourceand fortune claims-making. for Specificinterestgroups towardthe specific (includingthe state) form,or mobilize,or becomeredirected issue in question. approach with a challenge to their interests,groups benefiting from the prevailingdefinitionrespondby marshaling their own resources. The battle of these groups to maintainor change a rule is joined, the matter dependingon the balance of the mobilizedresources. To let out of the balanceof mobilized resourcesshould not be seen as however suggestinga simplisticaccountingbalance. Of coursethe matteris muchmore complex. For example,the efficientemployment resources employresourcesin an arenawherethey have of maximum impact-may be just as importantas quantity.The shed light on result is that over a boundaryof time, at time2,the originaldefinitionsurvivesor a new designation takesits place. for In explicatingthe model, we make the side by side(p) arguments its gain in collectivedefinition deviance of examining issues raisedin the 1. The model addressesor handlesma nyof the theoretical literature. For example, existing sociological explanations assign central greatness to, or ignore, the role of strain. The dialectical model directs the scholarsattentionto the role of strainbut does not preclude,in fact demands, examinationof other social processes.In addition,by think the state as an interestedparty, albeit a group with rum resources,it is possibleto examine prescribed actions without assumingthe origination of an all powerfulmonolithical the definitional outcomes. Furthermore, modelpermitsanalysis entitydetermining and explanationof outcomeswhereneitherside achievestotal victory. in 2. The dialecticalmodel is consistentwith the weapons-grade program the sociology of knowledge. As Bloor (1976) has requested,this modelis causal,impartial, and symmetrical. count on 1 is time consistentthat is, variablesappearin causal sequence with one another. unlessthese sequences are do explicit, then data analysis. The model thus allowsfor attem ptsat statisticalmodelfacilitating of processvariablesby techniquesdevelopedfrom social factisttraditions. ing The model treats deviance rule creationsas naturalphenomena. Whethera rule is good or unfavourable is irrelevant our analysis. RecallingGusfieldsstudyof the to temperancemovement,the validityof analysiswas independentof truthclaims about alcohol. Whetherthe drug is actuallyan aphrodisiac,a depressant,or a tool of the devil was essentiallyirrelevantto his conclusions. fetching such an it agnosticpositionhas methodological implications allowsfor the formalmodelvariables. Moreover,Bloorslast dictum-that analysis ing of phenomenological be symmetricalhasobvious implicationsfor the dialecticalmodel. melody that interestsfor or againstany definitionare handledin the corresponding way, and have the analogous causal commentary into the model. 166 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY 3. The model is dialectical. The theoryis timelessand has no end stage. Figure 1 shows only one referencef rame. besides upon acceptanceof Definition2, general vested or other interestsare alreadyin place, advocatingfor or againsta new definition.Though the theory is sequential,in the sense that it goes forwardin remainuntime, the units of time are not specified. Some deviancedesignations for long periods of time, others move more rapidlythroughstages of changed and vindication. Conradand Schneider,thinkingalong the very(prenominal) stigmatisation of and demedicalization deviance the lines, have excogitationualised medicalization as cyclical(1980271). We preferto use the termdialectical,in that it leaves ratherthan suggestinga rethe directionof the undermentioned redefinition problematical as turnto an originalpoint. nor4. Deviance and normalcyare not distinctcategories.We conceptualize coordinatesystem. As a positivistic as a point in a 3-dimensional guide malcy for conduct, a rule designatesthe limits of spot aroundthe point in which a behavioris seen as deviant. behavioris vie wed as normal. Outsidethis boundary, at present we tail end let off using the terms rulecreationand deviancedesignation more or less synonymously. The formerrefersto the boundaryitself, whichmay be mystifying or fuzzy the latter refers to the billet away the boundary. Any behavioralboundary,in our view, is subject to cultural,temporal,or situational between factorswhich forever defineit, or redefineit.Thus is the boundary deviancy and normalcycontinuouslydrawnand redrawn,and a behavioralresituation,but ratherby definitionoccursnot by quantumleaps, as an either-or or pulled througha system of space. In the dialecticalmodel the being pushed as pushesor pulls aremanifested strainor process. and analyticintentions 5. The model is macroscopic. Our preparation the collectivelevel. We do not directlyconsider,for example,the are clearly at motivationsof an individualactor or leader. For twain reasonswe down-playthe importof, or perhapseven ignore,such questionsas Did leaderX maked ecision or Y sincerelyor cynically?Is he or she a moralentrepreneur a normal (but not concernedsuburbanite? First,we doubt,in social factistlanguage, authoritarian) that such variablesexplainvery much variancein deviancedesignation. The individual,qua individual,role in collective, historicprocessesis continuously limited. To Our flash reasonis methodological the extentthat psychologicalvariables are important,how are they to be deliberateor assessed? For historicalstudies, motivationseems oddly Secondarysources,as well as several(a) problematic. kinds of documents,seem suspecthere. eventide in coetaneous settings,peoples of their own or othersmotivationsare not trustworthy, especiallygiven reports or the vested or strategicinterestswhich potty be served by lying, exaggerating, selectivelyforgetting. Rather,we focus on such variablesas strainand resources over time. and which sack up be operationalized measuredcomparably 6. The dialecticalmodel uses history. The model invit es, perhapseven demands, a given rule to be primed(p) in historical context. Moreover the data necessary to test the model are historical, preferably in time series, data.The model is molded by these data and is thus grounded and inducive as Conrad and Schnei- CreatingDeviance Rules 167 der (1980265) have suggested. In that sense the dialecticalmodel is meant to evaluate,as much as formallytest, historicalsequencesof data. 7. The model is conflictoriented,though not necessarilyMarxist. many an(prenominal) deviance designations,particularlythose formalizedas laws, are amenableto a Marxist analysis consistentwith the model. super sums of funds or other resources are very much used by ruling elites for maintenanceof deviance definitions do or, less often, change.However,some deviancedefinitions not seem to fit the Marxistmodel (see Markle and Troyer, 1979, or Hagan and Leon, 1977, for two such case studies). In the dialecticalmodel, vested or other interests(religious, ethnic, s ex, status,etc. ) preempt militatefor, and indeedbe successfulat, creat(uneming new definitionsof deviance. Similarlystrainmightbe substructural strain ployment,new technology,etc. ), but the model allows for superstructural (e. g. , new knowledge). utilise the DialecticalModel As an inductivetheory,the true test of the dialecticalmodel is its utility. allow us and suggesta few ways, then, how the model mightbe operationalized used. We in begin with the concept of strain,which passel be operationalized severalways. In our own researchon cigarettesmoking(Markleand Troyer,1979) and estrolegen replacements(McCrea and Markle, 1980), strainwas the appearance, or spreading new knowledge strainin our researchon Laetrile of gitimation, (Markle and beamsen, 1980) was, among other factors, an increasedconcern over set upcer. As new health-related knowledgeclaims, strain can be measured with variousbibliometric techniques.A impartial contentedness analysisof relevantarticles, over a pe riod of years, from force Medicus can be used to chart such knowledgeclaims. The perceivedlegitimacyof such claims can be assessedby the professionalprestige of the author or journal. Finally, the entry of such knowledgeclaims into the public arena can be measuredusing the new-sprung(prenominal) York generation Index, which Jenkins and Perrow (1977) found exceedingly effective,or by one of several intelligence activitypaperdata banks (e. g. , refreshedsbank)now in existence. after expression at strain,it is free enoughto identifyspecificinterestsinvolved in redefinition.Such organizations groups will have appearedas recipients, or sponsors,aggrievedparties,etc. , in news accountsor scholarlycitation. The resources of these groups can be measuredin severalways. The Encyclopediaof Associations, updated almost yearly, lists purportedmembershipsand other for simple demographics manysuchgroups. Moreover,most interestgroupshave which are usuallyeasy to obtain, often at literature or even regularpublications no cost. When interests are corporate,much informationon resourcescan be gleaned from yearly reports or, with somewhatmore effort, from restrictive In agenciessuch as the Securitiesand ExchangeCommission. ase studieswhere is an interestedparty, huge amounts of official statistics may be government for sale (see, e. g. , Markle and Troyer, 1979). Moreover,the researchercan use the relinquishdomof schooling symbolise to obtain a deep windowinto government actions and resourcesin variousdeviancedesignations. Throughpublic records and other availabledata, every concept in the dialecticalmodel can be operationalized. Indeed,to measureresourcesin comparable with(predicate) ways, we have suggested of the development a research protocol (Markleand Petersen,1981). 168 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY A Final formulate iancearecreated changed, beenneglected socialtheory research. and or in has We believethat neglectcomes from theoretical The misdirection. dialecti cal thesedifficulties. to model,whichis knowledge based,is ourattempt rectify Becauseit attempts compound traditional the theoryinvites to two approaches, both philosophical- empirical-based and criticisms. Thoughwe welcomethe we The in interested thelatter. realtestof thedialectical former, areparticularly modelis whether works. it Andwhether not it workscan onlybe judged or by it holdingit up to the lightof, and adjudicating with,historicaland coevalA crucialelementof social change and conflict,why and how definitionsof de- research. REFERENCES Barnes, Barry. 1974. ScientificKnowledgeand Sociological conjecture. capital of the fall in Kingdom Routledgeand Kegan Paul. Becker, Howard S. 1963. OutsidersStudiesin the Sociology of Deviance. newfangled York surplus constrict. and the critiqueof Marxismon law and crime. kind Problems26373Beirne, Piers. 1979. empiricist philosophy 85. Berger, Peter L. , and doubting Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The cordial Constructionof Reality. te nd City, N. Y. Doubleday. Block, Fred. 1978. The rulingclass does not rule. Pp. 128-40 in RichardQuinney,ed. Capitalist alliance Readingsfor a CriticalSociology. Homewood,Ill. Dorsey. Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledgeand friendly Imagery. capital of the United Kingdom Routledgeand Kegan Paul. Blummer,Herbert. 1962. Society as symbolic interaction. Pp. 179-92 in Arnold Rose, ed. , tender Behaviorand societal Processes. capital of MassachusettsHoughtonMiffltin. 1971. affectionateproblemsas collectivebehavior. brotherly Problems18298-306. . Chambliss,William J. 1964. A sociologicalanalysisof the law of vagrancy. affectionate Problems1267-77. . 1974. The state, the law, and the definitionof behavior as criminalor delinquent. Pp. 7-42 in Daniel Glaser, ed. Handbookof Criminology. Bobbs-Merrill. capital of Indiana Collins, Randall. 1975. ConflictSociology TowardAn Explanatory intelligence. bare-ass York AcademicPress. Conrad, Peter. 1975. The husking of hyperkinesisnotes on the me dicalizationof deviant behavior. amicable Problems2312-21. , and JosephW. Schneider. 1980. Deviance and MedicalizationFrom Badnessto Sickness. St. Louis Mosby. Davis, F. jam. 1975. Beliefs, values, power, and public definitionsof deviance. Pp. 50-59 in F. crowd together Davis and RichardStivers,eds. , The CollectiveDefinitionof Deviance. sweet York let loose Press. of Davis, Nanette J. 980. SociologicalConstruction DeviancePerspectivesand Issues in the Field. 2d ed. Dubuque,Iowa Wm. C. Brown. and devotionan organizational perspectiveon a moral crusade. Dickson, Donald T. 1968. bureaucratism complaisant Problems16143-56. Freidson,Eliot. 1970. Proessionof Medicine. youthful York Dodd, Mead. Galliher, toilet F. 1978. The politics of systematicresearcherror the case of the federal Bureauof Narcotics as a moralentrepreneur. Crimeand social Justice1029-33. , and Allyn Walter. 1977. The tucker of the social origins of the MarihuanaTax exertion of 1937. affectionate Proble ms24367-76.TheoreticalMethodsin loving History. American Graft, Harvey J. 1980. analyze of ArthurJ. Stinchcombe, Journalof Sociology851442-46. Gusfield, Joseph. 1963. emblematic military campaign location government activity and the AmericanTemperanceMovement. Urbana Universityof Illinois Press. -. 1967. righteous passing the symbolic process in public designationsof deviance. kind Problems 15175-88. delinquencysocial history, political ideology, and Hagan, John, and Jeffery Leon. 1977. Rediscovering the sociologyof law. AmericanSociologicalReview42587-98. CreatingDevianceRules 169 Hawkins, Richard, and Gard Tiedman. 975. The origination of Deviance. Columbus, Ohio Charles E. Merrill. Jenkins, J. Craig, and Charles Perrow. 1977. Insurgencyand the low-powered upgrade actor movements (1946-1972). AmericanSociologicalReview42249-68. Lauderdale, cast, ed. 1980. A governmental analysis of Deviance. MinneapolisUniversityof MinnesotaPress. , and pile Inverarity. 1980a. From apoliticalto political analysesof deviance. Pp. 15-44 in belt Lauderdale,ed. , A semipolitical epitome of Deviance. MinneapolisUniversityof MinnesotaPress. . 1980b. Afterword suggestionfor the study of the political dimensionsof deviancedefinition. Pp. 221-37 in Pat Lauderdale, ed. , A political Analysisof Deviance. MinneapolisUniversityof Minnesota. Levine, incrust Gene. 1978. The discoveryof colony changingconceptionsof customary potable in America. Journalof Studieson inebriant 39143-74. McCrea, Frances B. , and Gerald E. Markle. 1981. The estrogen replacementcontroversyin the United States and bang-up Britain differentanswersto the same question? piece presentedat the AnnualMeeting of the Societyfor the brotherly Studiesof Science,Toronto. Mannheim, Karl. 1936. political orientation and Utopia. Translatedby Louis With and Edward Shils. saucily York Harcourt,Brace and World. Markle, Gerald E. , and James C. Petersen. 1980. governance, Science, and malignant neoplast ic disease The LaetrilePhenomenon. Boulder,Colo. WestviewPress. , 1981. Controversiesin science and technology a protocol for comparativeresearch. Science Technologyand HumanValues 625-30. Markle, Gerald C. , and Ronald J. Troyer. 1979. corporation gets in your eyes cigarettesmoking as deviant behavior. favorable Problems26611-25. J. Mauss, ArmandL. 1975. mixer Problemsas brotherly Movements. Philadelphia B. Lippincott. Sociology6602-606. . 1977. Reviewof social problemsbooks. modern , and Julie Camile Wolfe. 1977. This globe of Promises. PhiladelphiaJ. B. Lippincott. of Neuhring, Elaine, and Gerald E. Markle. 1974. Nicotine and norms the re-emergence a deviant behavior. kind Problems21513-26. Oberschall,Anthony. 1973. accessible Conflictand well-disposed Movements. EnglewoodCliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall. Pfohl, StephenJ. 1977. The discoveryof infant abuse. affable Problems24310-23. Platt, Anthony M. 1969. The pip-squeak Savers The Inventionof Delinquency. lettuce Uni versityof wampum Press. 1974. The triumphof liberalitythe originsof the juvenilejustice systemin the United States. -. Pp. 356-89 in RichardQuinney,ed. , CriminalJusticein America. capital of Massachusetts Little, Brownand Company. Ritzer, George. 1975. Sociology A MultipleParadigmScience. capital of Massachusetts Allyn and Bacon. Roby, Pamela A. 1969. governing and criminallaw revisionof the rising York State penal law on prostitution. accessible Problems1783-109. Rose, Vicki McNickle. 1977. The rise of the botch problem. Pp. 167-95 in ArmandL. Mauss and Julie CamileWolfe, eds. , This background of Promises. Philadelphia B. Lippincott. J. cordial Schneider,Joseph W. 1978. deviate drinkingas disease alcoholismas a social accomplishment. Problems25361-72. Schur,EdwinM. 1980. The Politics of Deviance StigmaContestsand the Uses of Power. EnglewoodCliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall. Smelser, Neil J. 1962. Theory of CollectiveBehavior. vernal York Free Press of Glencoe. kindly Prob lems. Menlo Park, Calif. Cummings. Spector,Malcolm,and John T. Kitsuse. 1977. Constructing Stinchcombe,ArthurL. 1978. TheoreticalMethodsin societal History. New York AcademicPress. Robert G. Cushing,and CharlesG. Bowman. 1977. The antiZurcher,Louis A. , R. George Kirkpatrick, a pornography campaign symboliccrusade. Social Problems19217-38.